Artificial night lighting and protected lands: ecological effects and management approaches (revised August 2017)
Longcore T and Rich C. 2017. Artificial night lighting and protected lands: ecological effects and management approaches (revised August 2017). Natural Resource Report. NPS/NRSS/NSNS/NRR—2017/1493. National Park Service. Fort Collins, Colorado
Artificial night lighting represents a growing challenge for managers of parks and protected lands. The disruption of natural patterns of light and dark, which have been more or less reliable for millions of years, has a range of adverse consequences for wildlife across taxonomic groups and landscape types. This document reviews effects of artificial night lighting by habitat type and discusses the approaches available to land managers to mitigate and avoid certain adverse effects of artificial night lighting. Coastal dunes, beaches, and shorelines are a transition zone between terrestrial and aquatic habitats. They often contain gradients of lighting influence from developed shorelines to darker lakes and oceans. Sea turtles are prominent victims of these disrupted lighting regimes. The foraging decisions of many other species are influenced by lighting conditions, embodying tradeoffs between predation risk and dietary needs. Deserts and scrublands are open habitats with few barriers to light transmission. They are also often hot in the day, with large proportions of nocturnal and crepuscular species avoiding thermal stress. Many nocturnal desert species prefer low illumination levels and have good visual performance under the faint light of the darkest nights. Wetlands and rivers are often dark spots surrounded by lights, especially when close to human settlement. Movement of species into and out of wetlands and streams is influenced by lights, as is the movement of animals, such as fishes or aquatic invertebrates, up and down rivers and streams. Downwelling light mediates most predator–prey interactions in the water column. Changing light levels cause predators and prey to change depth. Small prey species are influenced by the phase of the moon, and lighting can degrade conditions favorable to successful foraging. Emerging research demonstrates that lighting influences the developmental rates of wetland organisms such as amphibians. Islands, oceans, and reefs are increasingly influenced by lights from onshore sources, hydrocarbon extraction platforms, fishing vessels, and all manner of ships. Downwelling light is also a dominant factor in structuring ecosystem processes in marine water columns, and many organisms are sensitive to extremely small changes in light levels. Extensive vertical migrations are driven by changes in surface illumination. Changes in surface lighting can have effects hundreds of meters below the surface. Lighting will alter reproduction and predator–prey interactions, and can attract organisms across wide areas. Grasslands are also open habitats with few barriers to block lights. Research shows influence of lighting on nesting behavior of birds, distribution of predators, and signaling by bioluminescent organisms such as fireflies. Deciduous and evergreen forests can block light and reduce its influence, but also contain communities of forest floor species adapted to lighting levels much dimmer than in exposed habitats. Therefore even low levels of light can influence foraging times or timing of reproductive activity. Alpine and tundra habitats are well represented in protected lands. Many species have annual rhythms designed to avoid the harsh winter that are potentially disrupted by lighting cues. In alpine habitats, the slope of the land potentially exposes habitats to direct glare from downslope sources in addition to light reflected in the atmosphere. Finally, urban environments have many artificial light sources, but still can support significant biodiversity in the form of both resident and migratory species. Migratory birds are attracted to lighted structures at night and collide with windows during the day. Some bat species are attracted to insects found under city lights, while others avoid them.
- Type
- Published Report
- Authors
- Longcore, Travis; Rich, Catherine
- Date of Issue
- 2017-08
- Publisher
- National Park Service
- Units
- NRSS , NSNN , NSNSD
- Keywords
- anthropogenic light, artificial night lighting, ecological effects, ecology, exterior lighting - environmental aspects, intensity, light pollution, lighting, night, night skies, nocturnal, outdoor lighting, spectrum, wildlife
- Subjects
- Ecological Framework: Landscapes | Viewscape | Viewscape/Dark Night Sky