Niobrara National Scenic River socioeconomic monitoring pilot implementation: Summer 2016

Resource Systems Group (RSG)

• This report describes the results of a visitor study at Niobrara National Scenic River (NSR) conducted from July 15 through July 24, 2016. During the sampling period, 253 visitor groups were contacted to participate in the survey. Of those groups, 217 agreed to participate in the study by accepting a mail-back survey packet. Questionnaires were completed and returned by 110 visitor groups, resulting in a completion rate of 51% among those visitor groups that agreed to participate in the study and an overall response rate of 43% for the study. • This report profiles a systematic random sample of Niobrara NSR visitors. Most of the results are presented in graphs and frequency tables. Summaries of visitor comments are included in the body of the report. Verbatim comments are included in the Visitor Comment Appendix (bound separately). • Fifty-four percent of visitor groups were groups of five or more, 16% of visitor groups were groups of two and 16% of visitor groups were groups of three. Over half of visitor groups (51%) identified as groups of family. • Six percent of visitors were 65 years old or older, 12% of visitors were 55 to 64 years old, 36% of visitors were 35 to 54 years old, 24% of visitors were 18 to 34 years old, and 22% of visitors were under 18 years old. • Hispanic or Latino visitors comprised 3% of visitation during the survey period. Most visitors (96%) were white. Few visitors were Asian (2%), American Indian or Alaska Native (1%), or black or African American (<1%). Zero percent of visitors identified as Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander during the survey period. • All visitor groups preferred to speak (100%) and read (100%) English when visiting an area such as Niobrara NSR. • Nearly all visitors during the survey period were from the United States. At the state level, 59% of visitors were from Nebraska, 13% of visitors were from Iowa, and smaller proportions of visitors were from 14 other states. International visitors comprised <1% of total visitation with 100% of international visitors from Canada. • Eighty-eight percent of visitors indicated having visited the park only once during the last 12 months, while over 10% had visited two times during the past year. Thirty-eight percent of visitors indicated that they had not visited another National Park Service (NPS) site within the past 12 months. • Ninety-five percent of visitor groups obtained information about Niobrara NSR prior to this trip. The most commonly reported information sources used were previous visits (55%) and friends/relatives/word of mouth (54%). The vast majority (90%) of visitor groups had the information they needed about Niobrara NSR for their trip. • Ninety-six percent of visitor groups used a car, truck, or SUV to get from their home to the park. Eighty-four percent of visitor groups spent up to 6 hours traveling from their home to the park. Forty-five percent of visitor groups traveled up to 250 miles from their home to get to the park and another 45% of visitor groups traveled 251 to 500 miles for their home to get to the park. • Sixty-nine percent of visitor groups indicated that visiting Niobrara NSR was the primary or sole purpose of their trip away from home. Twenty-seven percent of visitor groups indicated that visiting Niobrara NSR was one of several equally important destinations. • The most important reasons for visitors to visit Niobrara NSR included spending time with friends/family (48% of visitor groups), viewing wildlife or natural scenery (16% of visitor groups), and recreating on the Niobrara River (12% of visitor groups). Eighty-three percent of visitor groups reported that non-motorized water travel was their primary activity. Four percent of visitor groups reported having no primary activity. • Eighty-four percent of visitors stayed overnight in Niobrara NSR or in the nearby area. Over half (58%) of those visitors who stayed overnight stayed in lodging in the nearby area.

Niobrara National Scenic River socioeconomic monitoring pilot implementation: Summer 2016

Series

Collections